Sign up
Darkshaunz
The U.N should just disband in my opinion, the security council is the biggest fucking joke on the planet.

Iraq
US: We are now going to invade Iraq, after Afghanistan
UN: We condemn and denounce such actions
US: Go fuck yourself

Libya
US: We are now going to bomb Libya and Gaddafi
UN: Uh...we condemn?
US: How about if we had our NATO buddies back the plan?
UN: …..it's still aggression
US: Go fuck yourself

Syria
US: We are now going to bomb Syria
UN: JUST DO WHATEVER YOU WANT
Fun
Darkshaunz wrote:
The U.N should just disband in my opinion, the security council is the biggest fucking joke on the planet.

Iraq
US: We are now going to invade Iraq, after Afghanistan
UN: We condemn and denounce such actions
US: Go fuck yourself

Libya
US: We are now going to bomb Libya and Gaddafi
UN: Uh...we condemn?
US: How about if we had our NATO buddies back the plan?
UN: …..it's still aggression
US: Go fuck yourself

Syria
US: We are now going to bomb Syria
UN: JUST DO WHATEVER YOU WANT


This could be extrapolated into a thesis, but I don't think it'd be nearly as effective as what you've produced here.
Hunterbob
Fun wrote:
Putin is a fox, I kind of hate him but I kind of love him. He's such a fucking brilliant politician, but he's definitely a snake in the grass on the international stage - and a master troll to boot.

Definitely a master troll, what with the approved condemnation of LGBT communities in his country. They supplied the weapons - the old schoolyard adage works here: He who denied it, supplied it.
Jiminy
As I said earlier, what America is doing here has nothing to do with Syria, or chemical weapons. It's merely political posturing. If you step out of line, we will fuck you and we don't give a shit what the UN or anyone has to say. This is the clear message America is sending to the world post GFC.
SilverClaw
Jiminy wrote:
As I said earlier, what America is doing here has nothing to do with Syria, or chemical weapons. It's merely political posturing. If you step out of line, we will fuck you and we don't give a shit what the UN or anyone has to say. This is the clear message America is sending to the world post GFC.


They're clearly trying to set a precedent. America feels they simply can't allow or turn a blind eye to the use of chemical weapons during wartime (their use having been declared a warcrime) and must intervene in order to restore less effective killing methods. If you ignore chemical weapons usage during wartime then what's next? It's a very dangerous game of one up that can only end in mass extinction.

Thank fuck I live in Australia. Imagine having a shitty roll of the dice and Bam! You're a woman born in the depths of hell (also known as the middle east)

The US funds 22% of the UN's annual budget (2013). Everyone has a conflict of interest, it's just another massive fustercluck.
bladearts
Until the US shows some proof on the world stage I'm skeptical. A false flag attack to bring the US into the war that the rebels are currently losing is just as likely as Assad gassing his own people. The US is eager to get involved because they know if they don't act soon the rebels are going to be slowly cut down by attrition and low morale.

Once Assad loses air support the Regime is fucked just like in Libya.
SilverClaw


Scary stuff man. Apparently saran gas has nothing on VX.

So the US has enough to wipe out the entire world (billions) but the US and Russian stockpile combined only have enough to kill millions? Either someone failed math or they're grossly exaggerating, my guess is the latter.
Spoon
SilverClaw wrote:


Scary stuff man. Apparently saran gas has nothing on VX.

So the US has enough to wipe out the entire world (billions) but the US and Russian stockpile combined only have enough to kill millions? Either someone failed math or they're grossly exaggerating, my guess is the latter.


That was a cool video, shame about the sound being so broken.

I was also a bit confused about the contradiction you pointed out.
Post Reply